Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The Murdoch Press You Don't Think About

Call it irony, but while Rupert Murdoch was testifying before a committee of the House of Parliament in England--denying his responsibility in the hacking matter and condemning the lack of ethics demonstrated by his media organization--this happened to the New York public education system:

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/19/nyc_schools_approve_27_million_deal

Call it conspiratorial but denying involvement in one type of monopoly while
attempting another strikes me as an example of the type of media
manipulation of which Murdoch & Co. stand accused.


Wednesday, July 6, 2011

If Education is so Important, Why is it Allowed to be so Affected by Budget Matters?

This is what happens when money matters and schedules interfere with actual learning:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/06/education/06time.html?_r=1&hp

If the point is for children to learn, why is education measured in financial terms? Teachers obviously have to be paid and they should be paid well--but should their jobs include providing breakfast for children or unpaid time for summer programs? Does adding or subtracting institutional instructional time improve or lessen intellectual success? Does anyone care? And, is success only measured by doing well on a test, or are there other ways of measuring aptitude?

Sunday, July 3, 2011

A Brief Comment on Truth

My older daughter has finished her latest virtual high school course; it was in grade 11 Chemistry. We had to arrange a proctor; my neighbour, who happens to be a software engineer and works from home, did the job. He had to submit a form saying he was the proctor and the school telephoned to confirm his observation of my daughter writing the test. We had no problem with this...but, and this is what bothers me about the way schools currently work, so what if my daughter had written the test without his observation? If it's a question of honesty, who would she be cheating most if she did not know the material?

As part of our daughters' method of education, we don't grade by any means; if any of them have trouble with material, my husband or I help them or they find assistance on line. If they are supposed to "know" material for a particular course, and we are Classical educators in a way, they have to know the material. A passing grade does not mean anything; we figure knowledge is cumulative; so, if you do not know 'a,' chances are 'a+b' is going to be harder to understand.

We had an issue with my youngest copying the answers for her math out of the back section, the answer section, of the book. At first, I was so impressed with her ability to just know the answers, I completely overlooked the fact my daughter, a bright, intelligent child, was not a math prodigy. After a while, obviously, I clued in; my husband and I decided to treat her as a prodigy and see what would happen--we told her we were signing her up for a gifted math test because we were not able to teach someone of her calibre. She freaked...and told us the truth and that was the end of it. One has to practise math to know it...easiest way to learn it is to practise it...easiest way to catch a cheater is to act as if they know the material and can respond to any question.

And, this fact brings me back to the point of the material for a grade 11 Chemistry Course; once a student is familiar with the material at one level, they should be prepared for the next level. A problem exists if they aren't and no amount of testing is going to disclose such a problem if a student cheats. Call it honour, if you want, but, really, if a student wants to be a Chemical Engineer and cheats on Chemistry exams, their wishes are self-defeating. One would think that if the interest is supposed to be in Chemistry, a student would want to know the material. If a student is only trying to meet a Grade Point Average; such behaviour only reveals the irrelevancy of the G.P.A.; some students get the information and, for whatever reason, can't write exams; some students get the grades but have no concept of the topic.

This brings us back to the virtual school. The teachers, thus far, have been excellent; they are interested in their topics and wildly enthusiastic about sharing it. But, it is a school and certain restrictions apply ie testing; it is sad, really, that administrators have to verify honest behaviour for exams. It is sad, really, they have to monitor students who apparently choose to take Academic Science Courses. I don't know if my children want to go to University; but, they have been raised to keep their options open and if they want to go, fine; if one of them wants to be a plumber, equally fine; if one of them wants to be a beach bum surfing all year for the rest of their lives, I probably won't be happy but still fine. And, if one of them wants to cheat on a Chemistry Exam, I would wonder why they are taking it.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

The Problem with Ireland

An editorial from today's Irish Times by Professor Emeritus and former Dean of Engineering, John Kelly:

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2011/0702/1224299933120.html

The essay is interesting for its advocacy of Engineering and Science as contributors to the industry of Ireland and important to its return to profitability. Ireland is in a financial mess; there are a number of reasons for this, but the most damning is the fact the Irish Government nationalized bank debt. Prof. Kelly suggests funding Engineering and Science will contribute to the development of an Irish Industrial Complex. And, possibly a return to independent status. Of course, the current truth is that Ireland is a nation of tax evaders (head offices of international firms locate there because of its low corporate tax rate) and not really a country of critical thinkers. As advocated in numerous posts, critical thinkers are essential to the development of a robust economy and intelligentsia. Science is important for its thought as much as for its contributions to the economy; but, Art is important, too. Prof. Kelly offers stats that indicate Arts and Humanities Subjects get 7% of University funding in Ireland, presently. That could explain why Ireland nationalized its debt; its not like anyone stopped it from happening or even gave it a second thought. Compare Ireland to Greece. There are protesters angry with what the Government in Greece is doing; they are loud in their dissent, arguably irrelevant, but still present. The Irish seemed to just let their debt be nationalized; some were angry, but really most of the country seemed to just accept what was happening, not considering how it might affect the population and no consideration of other options of which I am aware. They were not an example of an astute populace; critical thinking is not an educational priority in Ireland; hence, there is more a "Me-First" attitude to the population where people who have jobs and security believe their privileged position somehow indistinct from the rest of the population.

Prof. Kelly suggests a way out for Ireland is through Science and Engineering. Maybe it is. But, while this sounds unrelated, Ireland is a growing population, currently 4 million people, as many as before the Great Famine in the 19th Century; only 4% of women breastfeed their children; in most other countries, even formula companies recognize the benefits of nursing. People who don't see the obvious are not really prepared for future shocks on any level. It doesn't bode well for the future. Ireland is no different than a number of African Countries (who by the way are trying to change their approach to child health). How are the two ideas related? At some point, a population of critical thinkers, educated in the Humanities and the Sciences, would assess the benefits of a certain tact on all the population rather than just a portion. Ireland is focused on the economy. Prof. Kelly is an advocate of one way of looking at the world, the economic one; however, the world is a place of many perspectives and too narrow a focus will, ultimately, lead, again, to the situation Ireland is currently experiencing. A broader based educational experience would enable various opinions on the economy and alternative methods of approaching a problem. Further, more people would assess ways to develop the greater good rather than just a single segment of society.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Terry Eagleton on Private Universities in London

This is an interesting essay by literary critic, Terry Eagleton:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/06/ac-graylings-new-private-univerity-is-odious

England's tuition costs are rising and making university education harder for the average Joe or Jane to achieve. As Mr. Eagleton indicates adding a private university to the mess in no way solves the problem; if anything, it probably makes matters worse. One wonders the best way to solve the problem...tuition increases, decreases, free education...but there is a tension between what is needed and what is recognized as valuable. How does society best recognize what is valuable and is the market the only way? As a stay-at-home mother, who gets no money, does work only my husband and children value, I cannot help but think society has to re-evaluate a lot of what is considered unimportant work.

A post-script: Stanley Fish on Governance of University in Idaho--is corporate management necessarily a bad thing for a very large institution?

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/06/faculty-governance-in-idaho/

And, another post-script: A view from Russia on American student debt

http://rt.com/news/us-student-education-unemployment/

What does anything mean, really, if education means debt and unemployment? How does education work in a poor society--you're talking about smart, hopeless people...maybe priorities have to change?

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Funny--in an Ironic sort of Way

Read what Professors from OISE are telling student teachers in an Irish Education program:

http://www.independent.ie/education/features/in-my-opinion-its-time-to-reimagine-the-ways-we-teach-our-children-2656478.html

So much for practise what you preach...

Friday, May 27, 2011

Poetry and Harold Bloom

My children have to read and memorize poetry; Susan Wise Bauer and her mother, Jessie Wise strongly recommend the activity in their book, "The Well Trained Mind." But, Harold Bloom and his "The Anxiety of Influence" strongly influenced me when I was going through school; in a way, I have always wanted to study like him--the work rather than the biography and I have always encouraged my children to read poetry, to try to understand it and to always appreciate it. Here is a link to video distributed by the New York Times; it is an interview between Mr. Bloom and Mr. Sam Tanenhaus, the editor of their weekly edition of their "Book Reviews" section.

http://video.nytimes.com/video/2011/05/20/review/100000000828027/harold-blooms-influence.html?nl=books&emc=booksupdateemb4

To support their work, I would suggest purchasing an edition of The New York Times or, in Canada, buying the Sunday edition of The Toronto Star.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Noam Chomsky on the Corporatization of the University

Something to think about...it's an hour and a half long but really interesting, I think

http://www.youtube.com/user/uoftscarborough#p/c/0/Q97tFyqHVLs

The link isn't working but try U. of T. at Scraborough on youtube. It's worth it.

Monday, May 23, 2011

Quality does not mean Quantity

An article from the Washington Post my friend posted on a home school site:

www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/wrong-question-wrong-answer/2011/05/22/AFZ5hS9G_blog.html#pagebreak

It is very important to encourage children's curiousity but how is it best encouraged? If a school is mired down with testing results, constant exams and academic requirements, it is producing students who know how to answer questions but not necessarily ones who know how to think. An elastic mind is moulded and affected by the world in which it lives; a child who lives with standards and requirements is going to know how live by them but not necessarily whether they are legitimate or realistic. In way, a child is being taught to think inside the box; unfortunately for them, we live in a world that admires people who think outside the box. They are being strangled by convention in way....

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Why Teachers get such a bad rap

An article from today's Irish Independent:

http://www.independent.ie/education/features/diary-of-a-schoolteacher-why-risk-burnout-when-the-brats-wont-remember-you-2617715.html

If nothing else, it shows an amazing amount of disrespect of a teacher for his students.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Nick Mount, Teacher

Perhaps,the highest accolade I can give to someone...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYVTPzgFcuc

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Free (?) Education

A good society, in the traditional sense, offers education to its citizens to make sure its democracy is composed of informed voters. Sure there are other acceptable reasons to have an educated populace, but I believe this reason is one of the most important. Having said that, it should be noted I am really beginning to rethink this independent education strategy, not that I regret taking my children out of school, if anything I am more sure of the choice, but I am really beginning to look at the ways the institutions of education are evolving and the choices and responsibilities parents are and are not making. Anyhow, something I think is a worrisome trend (with a quick note that the year I pulled my daughters out of school, I paid $700 in fees for 3 children under 12):

http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/education/schoolsandresources/article/959637--two-more-gta-schools-join-million-dollar-fundraising-club

Friday, March 18, 2011

A Brilliant Way to Introduce History

Just found these videos on youtube...they are produced by the children's BBC station:

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

And, the Results of Testing Are...

A brilliant Diane Ravitch interview...remember the best way to teach a child to read is to read to them, not test them:

Thursday, February 3, 2011

University Application

Things one learns....

As a parent who has pulled her children out of school, I have chosen to remain, for the most part, within a sort of accreditation process. My children have a curriculum, there are expectations for their academic achievement and I try, sometimes very hard, to fit what they want to do and explore within the confines of our home and study habits. Admittedly, it can be a hard life. There is no television in this house Monday to Friday and, sometimes, that is a real pain. The school year never ends; we do take time off any time we want, weeks off in fact but, on the whole, for every month, there is, at least, three weeks of school. There are no summer holidays; there are weeks of holidays, usually 2 weeks in August to correspond with my husband's holidays. But we live a pretty structured life. There are other responsibilities with which I must contend but, on the whole, education is happening all the time, round the clock. We have chosen to live this way and that is okay. It is not for everybody. Having said all this and knowing our routine is listed on the sidebar, I must now talk about University.

Two things must be noted at this point: 1) my oldest child is three years away from actually applying to post-secondary studies. I tend to research things and make sure I know what is going before I make decisions or enable my daughter to make decisions. Maybe I am pushy. It could also be regarded as the responsible duty of a parent whose child will not encounter a guidance councilor throughout their high school experience. 2) I personally know 1 homeschooler who has been accepted at an accredited university. There are lots of stories around about the independently educated who have successfully entered university; I know of 1 person. Needless to say, I actually find this piece of information a tad disconcerting. Surely there would be more graduates around seeing as home education seems to be a valid educational option and is so apparently popular. But, in my social awareness, there aren't. I have heard of other students who have gotten into university, did an email correspondence with a parent and know 1 person. I have a suspicion not as many get into post-secondary institutions as I would like to think do. Maybe others know better....(For the sake of clarity, I include colleges in my idea of post-secondary institution.)

Why I think this really...

My oldest daughter is in grade 10; she is enrolled in high school Science courses through a virtual, provincially-run school board; as all of her exams must be proctored, there is no debate with the marks. All of my children participate in math tests; kangaroomath is run out of the University of Toronto; the Cayley and Gauss tests are run out of the University of Waterloo; there are lots of other math tests and math olympiads around and I do know about a lot of them. I also know, regardless of marks, homeschoolers can use these tests for admission purposes only not scholarship application. For a point of reference, most independently educated students cannot apply for first year scholarships. There are civic and volunteer scholarships, History and Chemistry Exam scholarships of which I am aware that may be used but I know of no university that allows a homeschooled student to apply for a first year scholarship. Think about it: how could they possibly prove their marks? Further, most of these math exams are directed towards school participation. For example, the Tournament of Towns Math Exam requires a team and it is just logistically easier to run through a school program. Having said all this, I must discuss my first email discussion with an university college assistant registrar and the processes required for university application for a home schooled student.

There are none.

My first email to the registrar was a request to discuss my daughter's current academics sometime within the next month. In response, I was directed to the University application process for home schooled students. Having seen the site before I sent my first email, I can tell you it directed me to the Ontario University Application Board, I forget the acronym, and the fees and processes involved. I wrote back to the assistant registrar that I had already looked at this site, found it wanting and, as this was my alma mater, I needed some clarification on the following issues: 1)as my daughter is home schooled but taking Science credits from a virtual high school, how does she apply? 2)my daughter has valid math exam marks and science credits, but no high school diploma; how may she submit a portfolio demonstrating her work? 3)with respect to English, my daughter has no marks but was recently accepted as a junior intern for a National magazine; could the article she is supposed to write be used to demonstrate her literary skill?

I am still awaiting a response.

There are 3 years yet before my daughter actually applies to university; but I do know and understand there are requirements to be met, justifiably so. I have no problem with standards; but, I think, my experience highlights the fact there is no established protocol for independently educated students. It is a serious business and parents who fail to consider this reality are, sadly, misled. I hope the assistant registrar will email some direction or detail what was a previously used method for the assessment of the home educated. I find the whole thing rather scary. For all the popularity of home education, I would really like to know the statistics on actual applications and acceptances. My suspicion again is that there aren't as many home schoolers applying to university as one might think; the fact there isn't a protocol tells me as much.

Monday, January 17, 2011

The Warrior Mother

This post begins with the recognition Amy Chua's book "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother" has just come out in Canada and hasn't been widely read. Margaret Wente wrote an interesting piece on it:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/margaret-wente/how-to-raise-a-no-1-child/article1871060/

But, whether really Ms Wente endorsed a lot of its philosophy is up for grabs.

However, Margaret Wente does list a lot of the activities Ms Chua's daughters are not allowed to participate in: sleepovers, drama or school theatre, extra-curricular activities, watch television, have computers. Ms Chua is also quite rude to her children.

Well, my three daughters are independently educated (I like the phrase better than "homeschooling") and they are not allowed to participate in sleepovers, watch television, or have computers. They do a lot of team and solo sports; they play piano and guitar; they volunteer with Canada's Nature Conservancy and at the local library. So, in some ways, they are being raised in a manner very similar to Ms Chua's daughters and, in other ways, they are really quite different. Unlike Ms Chua, I am not rude to my children; her behaviour, if described accurately by Ms Wente, is ignorant and I refuse to believe symbolic of the Chinese culture. Respect is not taught that way and I know of no family in any culture where it would be acceptable.

However, the essay got me thinking. A few posts ago, I commented on Don Tapscott's endorsement of more school oriented technology. I wonder about the absence of commentary on computer technology in the article on Ms Chua's book. Among the top scorers on the PISAs (UNESCO's method of rating international educational standards) were Finland, China, and Singapore. These countries advocate well-educated children and not, particularly in China's example, particularly computer literate ones. Ms Chua's daughters are also well-educated; according to Ms Wente, they are well-educated by Chinese standards. She then goes on to discuss Ms Chua's method of parenting. What Ms Wente does not discuss is the absence of technology and its effect on the Chua girls. It is so easy to criticize the parenting method and, yet, completely overlook the obvious. Mr. Tapscott argues computers are the educational tools of the future but the most successful schools are not heavily endowed with them.

This is not to say I am a Luddite or completely against computer literacy; but I do wonder if one of the reasons Western educational standards are falling is because the computer has distracted so many students from the obvious, most basic word or number on the paper. Neil Postman wrote, years ago in a pre-facebook, google universe, that society was amusing itself to death. I would suggest it is not amusement, more distraction; one thing Ms Chua's children and mine do have in common is an ability to concentrate. As I regard all the flashing media in the society around me, I cannot but wonder if, maybe, some of the soul searching on Western Education should focus on actual pen and paper education rather than technological toys. You know as I write that, I think of all the corallories technology involves; for example, school budgets increase because of computer purchases rather than books. Yet, books have proven validation; I don't know about computers. It is just difficult to accept the criticism of one particular style of education without seriously regarding the most heavily endorsed attribute of one's own.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Reaction to the Private Tuition Fee Increase in England

Just another article on the fees increase of university tuition in England:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jan/07/universities-intake-simon-hughes

Two very quick comments:

1) the idea of improving the quality of education in public schools is always a good idea...though in Canada, improving quality education in elementary schools usually means more money and technology not an investment in teachers. Please look at the PISA schools, Finland, China and Singapore, and recognize that a quality education in no way means more technology or computer games. This is not saying computers are bad, they just have to be relevant to the educating of children and not the other way around; they are a tool to use. Though I do think the way they are in schools, people forget that piece of information.

2) there is a great comment by bishop29 (after the article) which highlights the fact a LOT of private schools in England are given charitable status; seems an oxymoron doesn't it? It does illustrate the point that when one is unquestionably well-off, there are tax breaks and when one is on a lesser income and attends a local school, usually, one has to pay more for what should be standard (ie notebooks, pencils, music lessons).

Sunday, January 2, 2011

An Expensive Education

Just an example of university education becoming the privilege of the wealthy:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/world/europe/03iht-educLede03.html?hpw

Prof. Nussbaum, among others, is proven correct.